Optimization of Village Planning Function Based on 'Post-rurality' Prospect: A Case Study of Suburban Villages in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
-
摘要: 在乡村转型颇受关注的全球城镇化发展背景下,本文基于乡村性演化应用较多的“后乡村性”研究架构,对深度参与全球城镇化、城市发展辐射较强、城乡联系紧密的粤港澳大湾区城郊乡村转型实景进行详细解读,在乡村典型跃迁式发展的超前状态之中识别“后乡村性”萌芽特征与内生发展动力不足、本土社区势弱、城乡拼贴风貌等管控盲区下的潜在发展危机,并基于“后乡村性”价值重构提出建立具有乡村竞争优势的城乡网络联系、复兴集体主义分配制度下的利益相关人主动协商积极性、耦合现代化进步与乡村传统文化智慧3个方面的村庄规划职能优化建议,为高效引导乡建资源投放拓宽规划广角。Abstract: In the context of global urbanization, where rural transformation has attracted much attention, based on the 'post-rurality' research framework widely used in rurality evolution, this paper makes a detailed interpretation of the real scene of suburban rural transformation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, which is deeply involved in global urbanization, has strong urban development radiation and is closely connected between urban and rural areas. In the advanced state of typical transition development of rural areas, identify the potential development crisis under the blind areas of control, such as the budding characteristics of 'postrural' and the deviation of endogenous development, the discourse of resource hegemon, and the chaotic image of 'half city and half township'. Based on the value reconstruction of 'post-rurality', the paper puts forward suggestions on the optimization of village planning functions from three aspects: the establishment of urban-rural network connection with rural competitive advantages, the revival of stakeholders' initiative negotiation enthusiasm under the collectivism distribution system, and the coupling of modernization progress and rural traditional cultural wisdom, so as to broaden the planning vision angle for efficiently guiding rural construction resources investment.
-
[1] 高慧智. 生态资本化:城乡融合的第三次循环[J]. 城市规划, 2022,46(7):35-45. [2] HOPKINS J. Signs of the Post-rural:Marketing Myths of a Symbolic Countryside[J]. Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography,1998,80(2):65-81. [3] 李志飞, 吴锦超, 张晨晨. 从乡村性到后乡村性:乡村旅游的理论展望[J]. 旅游导刊,2021,5(6):24-42. [4] 吕祖宜, 林耿. 混杂性:关于乡村性的再认识[J]. 地理研究, 2017,36(10):1873-1885. [5] 黄璜, 杨贵庆, 菲利普·米塞尔维茨, 等."后乡村城镇化" 与乡村振兴——当代德国乡村规划探索及对中国的启示[J]. 城市规划,2017,41(11):111-119. [6] 金利霞, 文志敏, 范建红, 等. 乡村空间重构的理论研究进展与理论框架构建[J]. 热带地理,2020,40(5):765-774. [7] 张勇, 冯健. 村落终结:快速城镇化进程中村庄的空心化与乡村性演化[J]. 城市发展研究,2017,24(9):98-108. [8] 胡晓亮, 李红波, 张小林, 等. 乡村概念再认知[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(2):398-409. [9] 李培林. 巨变:村落的终结——都市里的村庄研究[J]. 中国社会科学,2002(1):168-179,209. [10] KEITH H. HALFACREE. Talking About Rurality:Social Representations of the Rural as Expressed by Residents of Six English Parishes[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1995,11(1):1-20. [11] 肖婧, 刘化高, 黄强, 等. 城镇化2.0背景下乡村振兴的规划逻辑思辨[J]. 规划师,2022,38(7):141-144. [12] HIM CHUNG. Rural Transformation and the Persistence of Rurality in China[J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2013,54(5-6):594-610. [13] 中国科学院可持续发展战略研究小组.2005中国可持续发展战略报告[R]. 北京:科学出版社,2005. [14] 古叶恒, 周剑峰, 肖时禹, 等. 集体土地入市下的乡村振兴试验——一种新型城乡融合地区的规划探索[J]. 规划师, 2021,37(20):37-43. [15] 城市化研究.乡村生活知多少?[EB/OL].(2022-03-04)[2023-05-16]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/4rnRJGFzqkWG7bFNRRXNRw. [16] 郑丽娜, 王维艳, 李庆雷. 乡村旅游扶贫中"乡村性"的解构与重构——基于后现代主义的案例研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报,2020,35(2):94-100. [17] 朱羽佳, 汪德根, 周国艳. 传统村落居业分离式空心化识别及驱动机制——以苏州市东村为例[J]. 城市规划,2022,46(7):96-107. [18] 刘玲, 田国行. 守望形胜·因借地景——浅山区乡村景观规划空间控制的方法研究[J]. 中国园林,2021,37(12):110-115. [19] 施德浩, 陈浩, 于涛. 城市要素下乡与乡村治理变迁——乡村振兴的路径之辩[J]. 城市规划学刊,2019(6):107-113.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 37
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0