Assessment of Natural Disaster Risk in County Space: A Case Study of Yushan County, Jiangxi Province
-
摘要: 在全球气候变化影响下,自然灾害的发生频次及造成损失程度显著增加,科学评估自然灾害风险是实现风险有效管理及应对、优化国土空间开发保护格局的重要依据。本文基于自然灾害评价理论及三维风险矩阵方法,构建综合自然灾害风险评估指标体系,对江西省上饶市玉山县进行县域自然灾害综合风险评估及区划,并分析总结风险具体构成,提出县域国土空间重点防控区域。结果表明:研究区整体风险程度呈良好态势,绝大部分区域为中等及以下风险,高风险区面积极少且分布零星,较高风险区整体呈现为西北—东南方向上的“S”形分布带。按风险程度由高到低排列,各等级面积占全域比重分别为0.02%、12.54%、48.69%、7.18%、31.57%。县域范围内高、较高等级风险区是风险防范控制重点区域,在自然灾害的管控和防治工作中应依据风险的具体构成及内容采用对应措施。Abstract: Under the influence of global climate change, the frequency of natural disasters and the losses caused by it have increased significantly, while the risk evaluation of disasters is an important prerequisite for effective risk management and response. Based on the theory of natural disaster assessment and the method of three-dimensional risk matrix, this paper constructs an assessment index system, and then conducts comprehensive natural disaster risk assessment and regionalization on study area at the county scale of Yushan County, Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province. The results show that the research area is at risk overall but not prominent, and most areas are at low or medium risk. The high-risk districts are not obvious and scattered, followed by the second higher-risk areas, whose appearance like the character 'S' in the northwest-southeast direction. According to the risk degree, arranged from high to low, the proportion of each level of area in the whole region was respectively 0.02% and 12.54%, 48.69%, 7.18%, 31.57%. In order to reduce the risk in the high-level risk area effectively, corresponding measures should be adopted according to the specific composition and content of the realistic disaster risk.
-
Key words:
- land space /
- natural disasters /
- risk assessment /
- risk level regionalization /
- Yushan County
-
[1] 应急管理部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院,应急管理部国家减灾中心,红十字会与红新月会国际联合会,等.2020年全球自然灾害评估报告[R],2021. [2] United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction[R],2015. [3] United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction[R],2019. [4] 孔锋.透视大尺度综合自然灾害风险评估的主要进展和展望[J].灾害学,2020,35(2):148-153. [5] 吴舒祺,赵文吉,王志恒,等.基于GIS的洪涝灾害风险评估及区划——以浙江省为例[J].中国农村水利水电,2020(6):51-57. [6] 陈慧,马晨燕.基于GIS可视化的中国大陆沿海城市自然灾害风险评估[J].测绘地理信息,2018,43(3):59-61. [7] 牟凤云,杨猛,余情,等.基于RF-RUSLE模型的水土流失性公路自然灾害风险评估——以重庆市巴南区为例[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2020,39(11):114-121,127. [8] 侯奇奇,杨柳,张秀琼,等.基于GIS的水稻气象灾害风险评估——以四川广元旺苍县为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,43(5):35-45. [9] 国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于开展第一次全国自然灾害综合风险普查的通知(国办发[2020] 12号)[Z],2020. [10] 杨选梅,张宇.县级国土空间总体规划中的灾害风险评估探析——以阿合奇县为例[J].小城镇建设,2021,39(8):86-94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2021.08.011. [11] 李念春,张学强,冯泉霖,等.基于"承载基础-承载现状-承载潜力"模型的山东省地质环境承载力评价[J].西北地质, 2021,54(1):222-231. [12] 段顺荣,李延福,李春阳.基于GIS和层次分析法的青海甘德县地质灾害危险性评价[J].矿产勘查,2021,12(2):453-460. [13] 郑续,苗俊霞,王东,等.黄河中上游地质灾害高发县国土空间开发适宜性评价及功能分区——以陕西省延川县为例[J].西北地质,2020,53(2):289-297. [14] 徐玉霞,许小明,马楠.县域尺度下的陕西省洪涝灾害风险评估及区划[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(2):306-313. [15] 贾桂兰,郭建茂,雍燕亓.基于GIS技术的巴中市农业气象干旱灾害风险区划[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(7):124-133. [16] 梁如心,李娟,张维江,等.基于GIS的宁夏六盘山地区干旱风险分析[J].人民黄河,2020,42(1):48-52. [17] 李超超,田军仓,申若竹.洪涝灾害风险评估研究进展[J].灾害学,2020,35(3):131-136. [18] 成陆,付梅臣,王力.基于RS和GIS的县域洪涝灾害风险评估[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(6):37-44,68. [19] 刘晓冉,康俊,王颖,等.基于GIS的重庆地区不同季节干旱灾害风险评估与区划[J].自然灾害学报,2019,28(2):92-100. [20] 王莺,沙莎,王素萍,等.中国南方干旱灾害风险评估[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):12-24. [21] 张永领,张红.基于三维风险矩阵的旅游景区事故风险评估研究[J].旅游研究,2014,6(2):69-74. [22] 刘玉,唐林楠,任艳敏,等.基于多维组合特征的北京密云区乡村休闲功能评价[J].山地学报,2020,38(5):751-762. [23] 唐一鸣.国土空间规划分区方法研究[D].南京:南京大学,2019.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 97
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0