Study on Development Level Evaluation of Hunan Characteristic Agricultural Towns from the Perspective of Highquality Development
-
摘要: “十四五”规划是引领农业高质量发展的重要战略谋划,特色农业小镇建设是经济新常态下新旧动能转换和实现新型城镇化的重要举措。文章以湖南特色农业小镇发展水平评价为研究目标,选取湖南省15个特色农业小镇为研究对象,构造6个一级指标与16个二级指标对湖南特色农业小镇发展水平进行实证分析。AHP—模糊综合评价法的结果显示,准则层权重值由高到低的排序是特色资源、农业科技创新、经营者素质、生产效益、生态效益和农业设施装备,各级指标的模糊结果皆为“一般”成分最大且接近于“良好”,湖南特色农业小镇高质量发展水平目前处于较为令人满意的状态。灰色关联法的深入分析表明,各指标测度值的稳定区间为0.6~0.7,龙头企业为关联度最高的因素,最低为特色小镇开发规模,表明湖南特色农业小镇的发展总体水平有待进一步提升。因此,笔者建议综合推动湖南特色农业小镇高质量发展,需要从产业基础、内生动力、产业融合、发展环境四方面发力。
-
关键词:
- 特色农业小镇 /
- 高质量发展 /
- AHP—模糊综合评价法 /
- 灰色关联分析 /
- 湖南
Abstract: The 14th Five Year Plan is an important strategic plan to lead the high-quality development of agriculture. And the construction of characteristic agricultural towns is an important measure to transform old and new driving forces and to realize new urbanization under the new normal of the economy. Takes the evaluation of the development level of Hunan characteristic agricultural towns as the research objective, this paper selects 15 characteristic agricultural towns in Hunan as the research objects, and constructs 6 first-grade indexes and 16 secondgrade indexes to carry on the empirical analysis on the development level of Hunan characteristic agricultural towns. The results of AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method show that the order of the weight value of criterion layer from high to low is characteristic resources, agricultural scientific and technological innovation, operator quality, production benefit, ecological benefit and agricultural facilities and equipment. The fuzzy results of all levels of indicators are 'general' and close to 'good'. At present, the high-quality development level of Hunan characteristic agricultural towns is in a relatively satisfactory state. The in-depth analysis of the grey correlation method shows that the stable interval of the measurement values of each index is 0.6~0.7, leading enterprises are the factor with the highest correlation degree, and the development scale of characteristic towns is the lowest, which reflects that the overall development level of characteristic agricultural towns in Hunan needs to be further improved. Therefore, the author suggests that in order to comprehensively promote the high-quality development of Hunan characteristic agricultural towns, efforts should be made from four aspects:industrial basis, endogenous power, industrial integration and development environment. -
[1] 王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(2):17-26,157-158. [2] 刘贝,张友明,刘芳清,等.以特色小镇建设助推湖南乡村振兴的对策研究[J].天津农业科学,2019,25(10):87-90. [3] 周宏春.乡村振兴背景下的农业农村绿色发展[J].环境保护,2018,46(7):16-20. [4] 陈潇玮.浙北地区城郊乡村产业与空间一体化模式研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2017. [5] 王仕忠.特色农业小镇满意度分析与高质量发展[J].山东社会科学,2020(3):129-134. [6] 黄育华.特色小镇:在不断创新中实现高质量发展[N].社会科学报,2020-02-20(1). [7] 朱峰.黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市甘南县兴十四镇特色小镇建设纪实——现代农业科技引领[J].小城镇建设,2016,34(11):64-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8439.2016.11.015. [8] 李道勇,刘孟格,张勃,等.全产业链导向下农业特色小镇现代化发展研究——以北方国际种苗小镇为例[J].农业现代化研究,2021,42(1):39-48. [9] 辛岭,安晓宁.我国农业高质量发展评价体系构建与测度分析[J].经济纵横,2019(5):109-118. [10] 秦晓娟.中国农业高质量发展水平测度与空间差异研究——基于五大发展理念视角[J].中国农机化学报,2020,41(12):189-195. [11] 黄修杰,蔡勋,储霞玲,等.我国农业高质量发展评价指标体系构建与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):124-133. [12] 胡美君,王磊,左海霞,等.乡村振兴背景下农业特色小镇发展的综合评价——以东北三省13个农业特色小镇为例[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(3):86-92. [13] 余茜,许彦,李冬梅.农业特色小镇发展水平研究——来自成都的证据[J].世界农业,2019(6):98-105. [14] 吴奶金,陈高威,林珊,等.基于新型业态变化的农业特色小镇理念与构建[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),2017,11(3):7-12. [15] 张军扩,侯永志,刘培林,等.高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):1-7. [16] 杨佩卿.新型城镇化的内涵与发展路径[N].光明日报, 2015-08-19(15). [17] 郭鹏磊,张曦.基于AHP-FCE的低影响开发项目绩效评价研究[J].小城镇建设,2017,35(7):99-106. [18] 孙秀梅,侯士奇.基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的新旧动能转换绩效评价研究[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,35(1):9-14. [19] 颜嘉.宏观调控下长沙房地产市场的研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2006. [20] 樊维聪.农业政策对农村经济发展的影响[J].农业工程,2019,9(5):133-135.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 95
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0