Research on the Revitalization Path of Traditional Villages Based on PLS-SEM: Taking Ancient Huizhou Area as an Example
-
摘要: 传统村落作为承载中国优秀传统文化的空间场所,是不可再生、不可替代的历史文化遗产资源,备受政府和学界的关注。以乡愁和记忆为核心的乡土中国主旋律,使传统村落振兴成为传承与发展、保护与利用的共识。研究基于传统村落的发展依赖于内外驱动力共同作用的认知,选取徽州地区95个国家级传统村落开展实证分析,构建村落发展影响因素的偏最小二乘法结构方程PLS—SEM评价模型。结果表明,村落主体资源在发展中起主导作用,外部政策、市场等因素起调节性作用,配套设施、区域自然地理条件是传统村落赖以发展的支撑性基础要素。传统村落的振兴前提是满足空间的功能需要和文化的精神需要,需立足于尊重自然环境,通过挖潜主体资源禀赋和利好政策引导来实施振兴,根本路径在于通过营造实现文化属性的空间化、“互惠机制”完成社会属性的空间化。Abstract: Traditional villages, as a space to carry China's excellent traditional culture, are non-renewable and irreplaceable historical and cultural heritage resources, which have attracted the attention of the government and academic circles. The main theme of rural China with homesickness and memory as the core has made the revitalization of traditional villages a consensus for inheritance and development, protection and utilization. Based on the cognition that the development of traditional villages depends on the interaction of internal and external driving forces, 95 national-level traditional villages in Huizhou area are selected to carry out empirical analysis and construct a PLS-SEM evaluation model of the factors affecting village development. The results show that the main resources of the village play a leading role in the development, external policies, markets and other factors play a regulatory role, and supporting facilities and regional physical and geographical conditions are the supporting basic elements for the development of traditional villages. The premise of the revitalization of traditional villages is to meet the functional needs of space and the spiritual needs of culture. It needs to be based on respecting the natural environment, and implement the revitalization by tapping the potential of the main body's resource endowment and favorable policy guidance. The fundamental path is to realize the spatialization of cultural attributes through construction, and to complete the spatialization of social attributes through ‘the reciprocal mechanism’.
-
[1] 王葆华, 王洋. 太原赤桥村传统村落公共空间重构的策略研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(5):9-12,22. [2] 逯海勇, 胡海燕. 濒危性传统民居的价值认知及保护方法探讨——以鲁中山区石头房为例[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(4):688-692. [3] 任越, 刘思嘉. 基于GIS的传统村落文化建档式保护模型构建[J]. 档案学研究,2020(4):69-74. [4] 李久林, 储金龙, 李瑶. 古徽州传统村落空间分布格局及保护发展研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(10):101-109. [5] 李伯华, 曾荣倩, 刘沛林, 等. 基于CAS理论的传统村落人居环境演化研究——以张谷英村为例[J].地理研究,2018,37(10):1982-1996. [6] 李庭筠, 罗邱戈, 张金萍, 等. 基于扎根理论的琼北火山地区传统村落新业态发展探讨——以海口市美孝村为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(9):2079-2091. [7] 高璟, 吴必虎, 赵之枫. 基于文化地理学视角的传统村落旅游活化可持续路径模型建构[J]. 地域研究与开发,2020,39(4):73-78. [8] 孙荣垆. 传统村落旅游开发模式演变:以南岗古排"复兴"为例[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,42(1):100-106. [9] 王益. 基于防洪视角的徽州古村落象形平面形态考察[J]. 江淮论坛,2018(1):155-160. [10] 陈晓华, 谢晚珍. 徽州传统村落祠堂空间功能更新及再兴利用[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊,2019,11(4):92-97. [11] 汪强, 李早, 高翔, 等. 地域性民居风貌要素语义体系构筑方法及特征解析——以徽州地区为例[J]. 装饰,2019(6):94-97. [12] 王苏宇, 陈晓刚, 林辉. 徽州传统村落景观基因识别体系及其特征研究——以安徽宏村为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(5):13-17,36. [13] 陈伟煊, 陈继腾, 储金龙, 等. 徽派传统村落的整体性特征及影响因素研究——以黄山市传统村落为例[J]. 小城镇建设,2019,37(7):30-36,44.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2019.07.005. [14] 李久林, 储金龙, 叶家珏, 等. 古徽州传统村落空间演化特征及驱动机制[J]. 经济地理,2018,38(12):153-165. [15] 储金龙, 李瑶, 李久林. 基于"斑块-廊道-基质"的线性文化遗产现状特征及其保护路径——以徽州古道为例[J]. 小城镇建设,2019,37(12):46-52,60. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2019. 12.008. [16] 程开明. 结构方程模型的特点及应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2006(10):22-25. [17] Urbach, Nils, Ahlemann, et al. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares[J]. Information Technology Theory and Application,2010,11(2):5-39. [18] Joe F. Hair, Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2012,40(3):414-433. [19] Editor's comments:A critical look at the use of pls-sem in "mis quarterly"[J]. MIS Quarterly,2012,36(1):3-14. [20] 王美, 陈兴贵. 传统村落"整体活化"理路分析[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,37(6):25-33. [21] 张鸽娟. 系统动力学视角下陕西传统村落营建的多方参与机制及效应分析[J]. 城市发展研究,2020,27(10):32-36. [22] 杨福泉. 略论藏羌彝文化走廊少数民族传统村落文化的保护传承与发展[J]. 贵州民族研究,2020,41(9):31-40. [23] 李洁林, 刘艳红. 晋中地区传统村落营建过程中的自然生态适应性研究——以榆次后沟古村为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2020(6):41-47. [24] 吴泽荣. 实践、困境与突破:乡村振兴背景下民族地区传统村落的发展策略与路径选择——以广东为例[J]. 广西民族研究, 2020(2):35-40. [25] 唐胡浩. 乡村振兴背景下少数民族传统村落保护发展策略研究——基于恩施州鹤峰县三家台蒙古族村的调查[J]. 贵州民族研究,2019,40(11):79-87. [26] 孙霞, 李早, 高敏, 等. 传统村落空间特征与商业服务设施耦合分析——以世界文化遗产村落安徽宏村为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2017(z1):118-122. [27] 邹君, 刘媛, 谭芳慧, 等. 传统村落景观脆弱性及其定量评价——以湖南省新田县为例[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(8):1292-1300. [28] 杨立国, 龙花楼, 刘沛林, 等. 传统村落保护度评价体系及其实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J]. 人文地理,2018,33(3):121-128,151. [29] 林祖锐, 马涛, 常江, 等. 传统村落基础设施协调发展评价研究[J]. 工业建筑,2015,45(10):53-60. [30] Chin W W, Marcoulides G. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling[J]. Advances in Hospitality and Leisure,1998,8(2):1295-1336. [31] Igbaria M, Guimaraes T, Davis G. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model[J]. Journal of Management Information,1995,11(4):87-114. [32] Garmines E G. Reliability and Validity Assessment[M]. London:SAGE Publications,1979. [33] Hair J F, Sarstedt M, Ringle C M, et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2012,40(3):414-433. [34] Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw J A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development:a comparison and empirical illustration[J]. British Journal of Management,2006,17(4):263-282.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 312
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0